Lectures were used in the past as an old way of teaching a large number of students. As new technology is now available for education, some people suggest that there is no justification for lectures. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

　　The sweeping tempo of techology and science change our lifestyles and the way we think.the methods of teaching is inevitably,though not extremely advanced,alterring,which irrevocably rise a delimma whether the justifaction of lecture that utilized as an out-dated approach will exist or not. I will display the positive and the negative as a whole

　　The morden availability of teaching gradually capture the students mind,which is because of the obsessive access and the enlarged facilities. It spreads widely and somehow is accepted in certain zones . For instant,the most prevailing is the Tele-education that generally assist the governments to curtain the resource ,render more opportunities and even supply a platform in which various cultures could be exchanged if possible.despite that ,these entail the individuals self-discinple and the eager to learn for there remains lots of detailed and practically dowmsides.

　　On second thoughts,lecture is shared as a mainstream and thereby ragarded as a typical avenue.Not only it provides students the opportunities to have face to face communication ,but also is indispensable for interpersonal skills,which in my angle is foremost,though the pressure between them is gained.It is universally known that teachers act as sophisticated master to cultivate and in it form the methodology that courts.furthermore, they lit up the beacon of the thirsty of pursuit to unknown world.in another way,spiritual friends they are.given a compasible atmosphere,your spectrum is widen and horizon is broaden.critically, it makes students more sustainable and enduring.

　　To sum up,the first nut to crack is the focus on the atitude towards the ever-increasing ways,rather than the fair justifaction of lecture.what is worth mentioning but neglected is the fact that the lecture still take up the predominance.

　　Lectures were used in the past as an old way of teaching a large number of students. As new technology is now available for education, some people suggest that there is no justification for lectures. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

　　The sweeping tempo of techology and science change our lifestyles and the way we think.the methods of teaching is inevitably,though not extremely advanced,alterring,which irrevocably rise a delimma whether the justifaction of lecture that utilized as an out-dated approach will exist or not. I will display the positive and the negative as a whole

　　The morden availability of teaching gradually capture the students mind,which is because of the obsessive access and the enlarged facilities. It spreads widely and somehow is accepted in certain zones . For instant,the most prevailing is the Tele-education that generally assist the governments to curtain the resource ,render more opportunities and even supply a platform in which various cultures could be exchanged if possible.despite that ,these entail the individuals self-discinple and the eager to learn for there remains lots of detailed and practically dowmsides.

　　On second thoughts,lecture is shared as a mainstream and thereby ragarded as a typical avenue.Not only it provides students the opportunities to have face to face communication ,but also is indispensable for interpersonal skills,which in my angle is foremost,though the pressure between them is gained.It is universally known that teachers act as sophisticated master to cultivate and in it form the methodology that courts.furthermore, they lit up the beacon of the thirsty of pursuit to unknown world.in another way,spiritual friends they are.given a compasible atmosphere,your spectrum is widen and horizon is broaden.critically, it makes students more sustainable and enduring.

　　To sum up,the first nut to crack is the focus on the atitude towards the ever-increasing ways,rather than the fair justifaction of lecture.what is worth mentioning but neglected is the fact that the lecture still take up the predominance.