SAT考试写作素材two horses

　　A long time ago, there was a Chinese merchant. Once he gained two horses. One of them is a pure breed horse that can sustain long-distance rides, but the other one is ordinary has no good quality. The merchant took them home, and try to make them tame. The ordinary horse was pretty docile; it followed all orders that were given by its master. On the contrary, the talented horse was very wild and intractable. When the merchant firstly rode the horse, the animal became furious and cast the merchant off. Although, the horse was not docile, the merchant gave the best forage to it instead of the ordinary one. Because he knew that no matter how talented horse behaves, the real treasure would never be buried. The ordinary horses loyalty and good behaviors are useless to the merchant. In this case, we see that talent is much more important than morality.

　　Some people afraid of the objects which can not be totally control. I think this ideology makes them always emphasize that ones morality is more important than talent. However, in my opinion, morality is the criterion made by the majority, and sometimes it likes a cage that restricts peoples creation. For instance, in the 17th century, the church controlled peoples ideology severely. All citizens have the same morality. The people who waked up and started to do researches in science field were regarded as immoral, guilty and should be punished. This is the morality that existed in 17th century Europe. But at present, everyone knows that this morality is ridiculous. Thus, we can see that morality can be changed and amended with the passing of time.

　　As a government agent, talent is more significant than morality. Those agents are elites in society and work in the countrys central institutions. They must have talent to deal with all problems they meet. Some people might say that loyalty is the quality may more important than talent. But I think if a agent has no talent, or so this loyalty should be called blind loyalty which is utterly useless. I am convinced that the government agent should have his own thinking. A straight-arrow agent will never make any contribution. Morality always changes, but talent remains forever.

　　A talented agent likes a horse that can run a long distance. He is the diamond and shinning always. On the contrary, a person who only has morality is a good citizen, but not the one who has talent and we call them the elite.

　　SAT考试写作素材two horses

　　A long time ago, there was a Chinese merchant. Once he gained two horses. One of them is a pure breed horse that can sustain long-distance rides, but the other one is ordinary has no good quality. The merchant took them home, and try to make them tame. The ordinary horse was pretty docile; it followed all orders that were given by its master. On the contrary, the talented horse was very wild and intractable. When the merchant firstly rode the horse, the animal became furious and cast the merchant off. Although, the horse was not docile, the merchant gave the best forage to it instead of the ordinary one. Because he knew that no matter how talented horse behaves, the real treasure would never be buried. The ordinary horses loyalty and good behaviors are useless to the merchant. In this case, we see that talent is much more important than morality.

　　Some people afraid of the objects which can not be totally control. I think this ideology makes them always emphasize that ones morality is more important than talent. However, in my opinion, morality is the criterion made by the majority, and sometimes it likes a cage that restricts peoples creation. For instance, in the 17th century, the church controlled peoples ideology severely. All citizens have the same morality. The people who waked up and started to do researches in science field were regarded as immoral, guilty and should be punished. This is the morality that existed in 17th century Europe. But at present, everyone knows that this morality is ridiculous. Thus, we can see that morality can be changed and amended with the passing of time.

　　As a government agent, talent is more significant than morality. Those agents are elites in society and work in the countrys central institutions. They must have talent to deal with all problems they meet. Some people might say that loyalty is the quality may more important than talent. But I think if a agent has no talent, or so this loyalty should be called blind loyalty which is utterly useless. I am convinced that the government agent should have his own thinking. A straight-arrow agent will never make any contribution. Morality always changes, but talent remains forever.

　　A talented agent likes a horse that can run a long distance. He is the diamond and shinning always. On the contrary, a person who only has morality is a good citizen, but not the one who has talent and we call them the elite.